wk3 10.07/10.09: Digital Image, Time, Space, Interactivity, Narrative

[glegrady]

wk3 10.07/10.09: Digital Image, Time, Space, Interactivity, Narrative

The aim of the M200a Art & Technology is to give a broad overview of the field of computer-based art and its relationship to technological development. One approach is to consider how artists use the evolving technologies to:

1) Experiment and explore ideas and aesthetics (play of the imagination)
2) Arrive at new ways of creating and representing the world that could not have been done before

This week we are looking at examples of time-based art, and artworks that consider various methods for interacting with computer controls. Unfortunately, we are limited by time, so it is not possible to show the multitudes of works in existance. The lecture today features a selection of works that I have come across over time, and which I consider relevant.

For the assignment, select and discuss a few examples of interest to you, and/or possible underlying themes you see in a number of the works.

[shashank86]

TIME-BASED ART & INTERACTIVITY

This particular art form feels like an output of when an artist and as a human, wanna do a lot, experience a lot, desire a lot, and is interested in more of life out there, both naturally occurring and human-created.

Here in this art form, the boundary that bounds the constraints to achieve the aesthetics is blurred than in any other art form, since the number of factors involved in producing the final output is greater, with each varying in different dimensions. This also makes the art form a bit of many things if not connected very well, or the functions of each element involved aren't aligned sensibly. Though it seems like no rules are necessary here, it always depends on how best or how cool the final look plays an important role.

From what I have seen, Most of the time-based art is also conceptual art, but is often functional, and the progression of this practice could lead to a useful technique for wider applications. Then one might argue that it might make the art expressionless and more of a serving an application, but the art will be present and living in eternity through the form of truth, where it makes something work, and the idea of "expression" is either evolved to something else, making the creation complete, and thus making the creator as a triggering point in the "Entropy". Which leads to the idea that 'separation is not the end but the beginning of something new'. It could be an end of expression and beginning of a new application, or end of a beauty and beginning of a new style, or end of an artistic approach and beginning of a new art form.

Coming back to the TIME-BASED ART, the involvement and the expansion are limitless yet meaningless after a point of truth. Nevertheless, this art form is a depiction of the collective approach of all the present peak creations and innovations made by many indirect creators, even though an art piece is made by one person. The TIME-BASED ART is also symbolic of collective humans and nature's efforts. Hence, giving this art form the most rights and ability to achieve or redefine elements like truth, new meaning, beauty, or do anything bigger in the world.

The fact that even after all this, the Storytelling aspect has been such a strong force throughout the time, even in Time-Based Art. Which made me realize or feel that Storytelling is the biggest idea governing most of the artistic expression directly, and the techniques and engineering involved in making the expression, indirectly.

Be a David Lynch!! Everybody..., David Lynch!! That's what or how you gotta do the TIME-BASED ART.

[xuegao]

Legible City (1989)

I am extremely interested in this work with my background as an urban designer. The work is location-based with three famous cities- Manhattan, Amsterdam and Karlsruhe. In the work, they are all cities constructed with words and stories. Manhattan consists of 8 different stories and the characters are ranging from the most famous architect Frank Lloyd Wright, the current president of the US, Trump to people who don't have a name mentioned but very common in the city of Manhattan, like a taxi driver, a tour guide. They are non-related with each other at the first glance but they all part of Manhattan, which provides different perspectives of reading one of the most great cities in the world. I feel very resonated with the project as my master thesis explored a similar topic of how to construct reading of a place from multiple perspectives, especially the ones who are not considered very important persons, like the tour guide, the taxi driver.


For the Amsterdam and Karlsruhe, there are exploration of how to rebuild historical cities in the virtual environment. The city boundary is the 1800's boundary instead of the current city, and the texts visualization is a manifest of architectures in the city with same heights, layout, even the colors of the texts matches the buildings. Biking as a way to travel and interact with the cities is very clever and quite suits the scenario, especially in Amsterdam, and the attention to architectural scale make the experience both hyper-reality and authentic.


David Rokeby - San Marco Flow
For me, San Marco Flow is another way of exploring cityscape, focusing on time domain. By layering images and sharpen edges, the work visualizes the movement of people and pigeons using San Marco Plaza. It present a record of the temporary social architecture that is shaped by the permanent physical architecture of the piazza.



The two works are both interpretations of spatial and movement experience in urban space. The Legible City focuses on personal interaction and travel through multiple spaces, while San Marco Flow focuses on multiple users within a single space. I think the contract is very interesting.

[jintongyang]

I’m very interested in full-body immersive experience with affective computing. In the 5th episode of Black Mirror Season 7, there is a technology called Eulogy that uses brainwave control and AI generation to turn old photos into 3D spaces that people can actually walk into, so they can relive their lost memories. Even though it’s fictional, I think it shows the most fascinating part of time-based arts — using digital technology to bring still images back to life. Time, space, and emotion inside an image are no longer just things to look at, but something that can be experienced and rebuilt.

After photography became digital, the information inside an image (both the pixels and its cultural or emotional meaning) can be encoded, analyzed, edited, and regenerated. This shift has opened up new possibilities for art. Artists can now use multimodal and immersive ways to reinterpret time and space, creating non-linear and rule-breaking worlds that allow audiences to physically feel and sense the flow of information.

Among this week’s works, I was particularly drawn to David Rokeby’s San Marco Flow (2004) (http://www.davidrokeby.com/smf.html).Using algorithms to analyze the trajectories, speeds, and densities of people moving through Piazza San Marco in Venice, Rokeby overlays moments from different times into the same spatial frame, creating a “river of time.” The work mixes stillness and motion, becoming both a record of real time and an abstract visualization. As light and shadow interact with the viewer’s body, the viewers become both observers and data points, transforming the medium of immersion from a physical space into a dynamic information system.

I think this kind of work explores how humans and digital systems coexist. In the near future, how can digital media fold or expand time and space? And how can information respond to emotion and body in real time?

Rafael Lozano-Hemmer’s Body Movies (2001) (Fig.1) is a similar example. He projected thousands of portraits taken from the streets onto building facades. The portraits only appear inside the big shadows of the passersby (their silhouettes become triggers for the images to emerge). As people move, new faces are revealed or hidden, creating a real-time narrative between light and movement. The work makes the public space an interactive stage, where the audience becomes both the subject and the medium — an early example combining HCI and public art.


Fig.1. Rafael Lozano-Hemmer, Body Movies (2001), https://www.lozano-hemmer.com/body_movies.php


Refik Anadol develops relevent concept on a larger scale. With AI and big data, he transforms architecture into “buildings of data.” Works like Melting Memories (2018) (Fig.2) and Data Universe (2021) (Fig.3) show what he calls “information fluidity.” He turns memories, neural data, or environmental data into moving light patterns, creating an algorithmic sense of immersion. This also shows how immersion expands from the body into the data world.


Fig.2. Refik Anadol, Melting Memories (2018), https://refikanadol.com/works/melting-memories/


Fig.3. Refik Anadol, Data Universe (2021), https://refikanadol.com/works/pladis-data-universe/


Meanwhile, artists are exploring real-time feedback through physical installations. For example, Daniel Rozin’s Wood Mirror (1999) (Fig.4) uses hundreds of wooden tiles that flip by motors to show the viewer’s reflection instantly. It’s both mechanical and digital — a kind of dialogue between human and machine perception.


Fig.4. Daniel Rozin, Wood Mirror (1999), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZPJ0U_kpNg


Lozano-Hemmer’s recent works, such as Binocular Tension (2024) and Recurrent Kafka (2025) (Fig.5), incorporate affective computing and psychological feedback systems. By collecting viewers’ physiological and emotional data in real time, the system generates continuously changing visual and sonic environments, forming an empathic loop between installation and audience, where technology doesn’t just detect emotion but also helps produce it.


Fig.5. Rafael Lozano-Hemmer, Recurrent Kafka (2025), https://www.lozano-hemmer.com/recurrent_kafka.php


These works expand the meaning of time-based art itself. Instead of a fixed timeline or duration, time here becomes a living feedback process. Human perception is now being perceived, analyzed, and rebuilt by machines, and the “time” of experience is co-created by both. Overall, immersive art today goes beyond illusion. It enters physical, emotional, and algorithmic dimensions, reorganizing time and space through AI and sensory feedback. Artists reorganize time and space, making experience itself non-linear, non-physical, yet deeply empathetic.

[ruoxi_du]

I want to discuss two works: the first is "Granular Synthesis(Akemi Takeya)", and the second is "Steina Vasulka – Violin Power (1978)."


Granular Synthesis(Akemi Takeya)
When I saw Granular Synthesis (Akemi Takeya) in class, I was honestly shocked. I had always thought granular synthesis only existed in sound, but this was the first time I saw it used in both audio and visuals together. Also, I think granular synthesis is one of the best techniques to express time-based art. When it reconstructs and deconstructs both sound and image into micro fragments—tiny grains—and then reassembles them into new rhythmic, visual, and sonic patterns, the timeline of this artwork is being changed. Instead of showing a continuous video or a simple linear narrative, the work keeps shifting and looping, stretching time or freezing moments in ways that feel both mechanical and organic.
All these fragments—the repetition, delay, and transformation—create a sense of suspended time and explosive energy, where the audience never knows what sound or image will come next. In this way, the work easily delivers a powerful impact. For example, when I first saw the scream in this piece in class, it left a truly strong and lasting impression on me. (Figure1)

Personally speaking, I’ve always really liked granular synthesis, especially in the field of audio, since the sound it produces is so unique and special. Whenever I use granular synthesis, I always feel that it gives music a completely new meaning. For example, I once composed a piece called The Fragment, in which I built a granular synthesis patch in Max/MSP and used it to change the live sound of a clarinet. I chose this technique because it breaks the traditional tone of the clarinet into tiny particles, turning it into something more electronic and fragmented. To me, this process feels very similar to what’s happening today between humans and rapidly developing technology—the appearance of new technology constantly reshapes and even “breaks apart” people’s original way of life.

Figure 1- Steina Vasulka

Steina Vasulka – Violin Power (1978)
The artwork Violin Power really caught my attention because this is an early and creative experiment with audiovisualisation — using a Scan Processor to control and shape the video scan lines. It’s honestly pretty amazing, especially considering that back then, computer graphics weren’t even common yet. I really like how Steina used the brightness and sound signals to change the form of the image. Compared to many modern visuals generated by sound, this feels much more direct — it actually shows what the audio wave“looks like.” (Figure 1)

Figure1 - Granular Synthesis

In another part of the piece, the sound makes the video flicker and pulse frequently (Figure 2).. For me, that flickering feels like the visual form of musical noise. Just like in audio, noise isn’t bad — it’s still a kind of music, which is just a powerful way to express the project’s mood.

Figure2 - Granular Synthesis

There’s also something deeper meaning I think, in how this work plays with space and time. For example, in one moment (Figure 3), the music triggers two cameras so that Steina’s face and back appear on the screen at the same time. I think that’s a really interesting way to merge space and alter the perception of time. As the audience, we can hear the sound instantly while seeing both sides of the performer simultaneously, which feels truly special and immersive to me.

Figure3 - Granular Synthesis

[gevher]

The concept of time and space in visual installations depend on how interesting or immersive one finds the artwork, in my opinion. If someone is only taking a glance while passing through, their presence will be limited to the here and now in the location. I remember seeing one of both Nam June Paik and Bill Viola’s works when I was working at the Memorial Art Gallery (MAG) in Rochester, NY.

I remember seeing a bunch of other versions of the Bakelite Robot online but the version in the MAG had 7 screens that each displayed colourful moving images reminiscent of the Windows Media Player sound visualisations. The “robot” aspect of the work came from the humanoid shape created by the merging of multiple radios. It had a head, a torso, arms, and legs, and the small TV screens were placed into the hollow circular spaces left from the dials removed from the radios.



For me personally, this humanoid presentation was more impactful than seeing a bunch of screens on a wall. Humans tend to anthropomorphise inanimate objects all the time. I believe that having this artwork shaped like a tiny human helped museum-goers feel a deeper connection than they would have felt normally, in the given time and space.

The second example, again in MAG, was the video installation of Bill Viola called “Martyrs”. This particular work was presented in the form of four vertical HD flat-screen monitors next to each other. On each screen, there was a human figure gradually being engulfed in either water, earth, fire, or air. I remember seeing an elemental approach in the example shown in last week’s class as well. He seems to be focusing on natural forces and how one might feel in a space surrounded by these elements over time. Which makes sense when we think about his explanation for this particular artwork. He mentions that the word "Martyr" comes from the Greek word (μάρτυς) which means "witness". This has deep ties with religion as well where books refer to people bearing witness to death and resurrection (you can also see the resemblance to Jesus' crucifixion pose in the image below). The screens were being displayed right across from a baroque organ too, which is pretty on theme I'd say.



In our current time, the media makes us all witnesses to human suffering around the world. I believe that these four screens showcase the human capacity to bear pain in order to remain true to whatever's keeping them alive (the chair, the ropes, maybe their values and beliefs).

[firving-beck]

I was particularly struck by two vastly different uses of machine-generated aesthetics to manipulate time, especially distinct from one another since they both work with human source material. The first of which is Rokeby’s San Marco Flow, which captures the temporal element linearly via long exposure. The second piece, MODELL 5, uses granular synthesis to remix footage on a microscopic level. How might time be used to disrupt versus to extend a prior-existing visual narrative?

In San Marco Flow, by tracking human paths, the passage of time is captured in a semi-static (slow motion?) way. The video has a comforting, lulling effect due to the soft light trails and regular pacing. The footage serves as a continuation/extension of the original experience, since it is linear and understandable from the human perspective. Despite being “zoomed out” and capturing less recognizable detail, it feels atmospheric and almost impressionistic, and therefore reads as more universal. Adding to this effect, San Marco Flow speaks to the collective, modeling a group dynamic and larger social region rather than an individual.

San Marco Flow (2004), still from video installation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7tPyB_jEhE

In contrast, MODELL 5 continually remixes the video violently, creating an overwhelming and visceral experience for the viewer. The use of granular synthesis renders footage and expression incomprehensible, leaning into an inhuman perspective. In this case, the typical narrative and understanding is upended – any semblance of recognizable expression or movement is quickly destroyed by remixing. This is despite having a more “personal” and intimate premise, where the viewer is situated in front (and literally surrounded by) a singular human face. Individualism instead serves to alienate the viewer.

MODELL5 (1994-1996), still from video documentation, showing how piece is situated in gallery

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATWljMbvVTg

[ericmrennie]

One of the most significant and contemporary qualities of computer-based art is its capacity to directly involve the viewer, granting them an active role in shaping the narrative. Three works that exemplify this idea are Lorna by Lynn Hershman Leeson, As Yet Untitled by Max Dean, and Videoplace by Myron Krueger.

Lorna, a story about an agoraphobic woman, is an interactive piece of video art created for LaserDisc. In this work, the viewer assumes the role of the user, selecting menu options that shape a non-linear narrative. The user can interact with objects in a manner similar to a role-playing game (RPG), effectively choosing their own adventure. By exploring Lorna’s environment, the user develops empathy for her condition, experiencing the constraints and limitations imposed by her apartment. Each viewing of Lorna produces different storylines, ultimately culminating in one of several possible endings: Lorna taking her own life, leaving her apartment for Los Angeles, or destroying her television set (McNeil).

Lynn Hershman Leeson's Lorna (McNeil)

Myron Krueger, a pioneer of augmented reality, created Videoplace in 1975. This interactive installation allows two participants, either in the same room or across the world, to engage directly with the work. When a participant enters the space, their silhouette is projected onto a screen in front of them. By moving their bodies, participants can navigate the screen and manipulate each other’s images through resizing, rotation, color changes, and other transformations. In this way, the participants become active creators of the artwork (Krueger).

Max Krueger's Videoplace (Krueger)

Lastly, As Yet Untitled by Max Dean places the viewer in control of the fate of family photographs. A robotic arm in the piece is programmed to pick up a photograph and present it to the viewer. The robot will then place the photo in a shredder unless the participant places their hands on two cutouts which signals the robot to save it. If no viewer intervenes or if the viewer chooses not to stop the shredding, the photographs are fed into the shredder (Dean).

Max Dean's As Yet Untitled (Dean)

Works Cited

Dean, Max. As Yet Untitled - 1992–1995. n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2025. https://www.maxdean.ca/19901999/as-yet- ... -1992-1995.

Krueger, Myron. Videoplace. n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2025. https://aboutmyronkrueger.weebly.com/videoplace.html.

McNeil, Erin. "On Lynn Hershman Leeson’s Lorna." Walker Art Center, 15 July 2016, https://walkerart.org/magazine/lynn_her ... zymandias/

[hyuncho]

.

[hyuncho]

A-volve (1994) by Christa Sommerer and Laurent Mignonneau is an interactive installation that allows visitors to participate in the creation of virtual life forms. Through audience input, these digital organisms come to life, interacting both with viewers and with one another to form an infinite life cycle that reflects human behavior and the principles of evolution.


A-volve (1994) by Christa Sommerer & Laurent Mignonneau

While experiencing A-volve, I was reminded of several other artworks and games that explore artificial ecosystems and the cycles of life. One example is Flow, an artistic video game designed by Jenova Chen and Nicholas Clark, which visualizes the theory of “flow” through a microcosmic aquatic ecosystem where microorganisms evolve by consuming others.


Flow (2006) by Jenova Chen & Nicholas Clark

Another related example is Will Wright’s game Spore, which focuses on evolution as a creative and interactive process. In Spore, the player begins as a single-cell organism and gradually evolves into a complex, intelligent being. Each action taken during the early microbial stage influences how the organism develops in later stages, illustrating how small-scale behaviors shape large-scale evolutionary outcomes.


Spore (2008) by Will Wright / Maxis

In the field of media art, subsequent works that further developed the idea of artificial ecosystems include Ian Cheng’s Emissaries trilogy and BOB (Bag of Beliefs). Cheng’s works use game engines and artificial intelligence to generate virtual worlds that evolve autonomously, without direct human intervention.

Emissaries (2015–2017) by Ian Cheng

Similarly, Haru Ji and Graham Wakefield’s Artificial Nature series creates immersive mixed-reality ecosystems inspired by complex systems theory and biology. These environments are designed to continuously transform and adapt through interactions with their physical and social surroundings.


Artificial Nature (2011–present) by Haru Ji & Graham Wakefield

From A-volve’s audience-generated organisms to Ian Cheng’s AI-driven ecosystems, these works all depict evolving entities that interact with one another and their environments. To me, they embody the essence of media art. Media art is not a static medium; its definition continually shifts alongside the technologies and cultural contexts of its time. Like a living organism, media art itself evolves and transforms. This is precisely what makes it both time-based and interactive by nature.